Showing posts with label grooming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label grooming. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Interspecies Grooming: Zanzibar Red Colobus and Cattle

I have written about interspecies grooming on this blog, a post that appeared sometime last October, Interspecies grooming at The Bronx Zoo. Interspecies grooming first peaked my interest after I realized that two of my cats would readily groom me (hair or skin). Of course, grooming held a special place in my heart. I wrote a thesis comparing grooming behavior in geladas and hamadryas baboons for my undergraduate thesis.

My blog post was featured and I was interviewed for this post on Environmental GraffitiMonkeys Grooming Other Animals! earlier this October (almost a year after my interspecies blog post appeared). Interspecies grooming can occur among primate groups or among other non-primate groups. There are documented incidents where different primate species or primate and non-primate species (for example ruminants) groom each other. Interspecies grooming is not limited to the natural range of the animals as well. There are also documented bouts of interspecies grooming in captivity, mostly in zoos.

I received an email yesterday from Dr. Katarzyna Nowak, who is affiliated with Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU) and the Udzungwa Elephant Project. She sent in a photo of an interspecies grooming in action between a few Zanzibar red colobus (Procolobus kirkii) and a cattle (Bos taurus).

Zanzibar red colobus grooming a calf outside of Jozani-Chwaka Bay National Park.
Photo by Dr. Katarzyna Nowak.

Dr. Nowak later filled me in on this photo.

Hi Raymond, 

The colobus and cows share this environment (it's a farm-field mosaic outside of the national park) so I presume that they compete at least to some extent over herbaceous vegetation as the colobus are largely terrestrial here. But it is only once that I observed this behavior (I was with primatologists Tom Struhsaker and Andy Marshall when we saw this) and I don't know of anyone else who has seen it before or since...but again, I imagine it happens more often. 

Interspecies grooming is a very fascinating interaction, at least to me. I think that it is easier to document interspecies grooming than to tease out why this behavior exist between individuals. But of course, each interaction is probably unique between the groomer and the one being groomed. I have wondered whether interspecies grooming in captivity is due to boredom. But of course I have no way of testing these hypotheses given that it's quite hard to proof that an animal is "bored". There are, of course, some ingenious ways out there to find out what these animals are thinking.

Please feel free to discuss or tell me why you think interspecies grooming occur and what types of studies can be used to further elucidate this phenomenon. Seen an interspecies grooming in action? Feel free to email me and tell me all about it. Emails with pictures will get a cookie!

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

[UPDATED] Are slow lorises really venomous? (Yes they are. And poisonous too!)


Tickling is torture. Please do not share and "like" pet loris videos.

EDIT: Recent studies by Dr. Anna Nekaris and her team have shown that slow lorises are both poisonous AND venomous (how interesting!). It has came to my attention that this blog post is being used by those to argue for the suitability of slow lorises as pets. I concluded that slow lorises are not poisonous, but could be venomous, citing lack of evidence. However, this has since been proven incorrect with evidence to support that slow lorises are BOTH poisonous and venomous. Just to make one thing very clear, I do not condone keeping nonhuman primates as pets.

I passionately plea that you do not purchase or keep slow lorises as pets. Slow lorises do not make good pets and the pet trade that brought these lorises to you are cruel and unsustainable. Please read this post on why we need to not support slow loris pet trade.

- Prancing Papio 


*****************************************************************************

Slow loris by Frans Lanting. Photo from The Guardian.



I must say, the idea of venomous primates never crossed my mind. While venomous species do exist in mammals, it is much more common in insects, reptiles and fishes. In primates, slow lorises (genus Nycticebus) are thought to be venomous in Thai folklore (Wilde, 1972) but are they really?

Nycticebus
As of 2010, the genus Nycticebus consists of four species: Pygmy slow loris (Nycticebus pygmaeus), Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus), Sunda slow loris (Nycticebus coucang) and Bengal slow loris (Nycticebus bengalensis). The Javan slow loris was previously recognized as a subspecies but has since been elevated to species status. These prosimians are found in different parts of Southeast Asia. Nycticebus range, in red. Illustration from Primate Info Net.

Slow lorises are arboreal primates that move quadrupedally between branches. They are nocturnal and omnivorous, feeding on plant matter and insects. Slow lorises sleep during the day, curled up like a ball in hidden parts of trees above ground. Their predators include pythons (Python reticulatus), hawk-eagles (Spizaetus cirrhatus) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Slow lorises have a relatively low metabolism compared to similar-sized mammals (Gron, 2009). Sunda slow loris (Nycticebus coucang). Photo from Primate Info Net.
Colors and markings in Nycticebus species and subspecies. Illustration from Loris Conservation.

Venomous vs. Poisonous
Although the words "venomous" and "poisonous" are used interchangeably in everyday speech, they are actually fundamentally different. By definition, venom has to be injected into the body, introduced by a bite or a sting. Poison, on the other hand, is ingested or inhaled  into the body by the victim. Thus, venomous and poisonous animals are altogether different.

The blue dart frog (Dendrobates azureus) is a poisonous animal while the Indian cobra (Naja naja) is a venomous animal.

Brachial gland of slow lorises
The flexor surface or the ventral side of the elbow has a slightly raised but barely visible swelling termed the brachial gland (Hagey et al., 2006; Krane et al., 2003). Observations from captive slow lorises show that when the animal is disturbed during handling, they secrete about 10 microliters (μL) of clear, strong-smelling fluid in the form of an apocrine sweat (exudate) from their brachial gland . Usually, male and female slow lorises assume a defensive stance when disturbed. They bend their heads downwards between uplifted forelegs, rubbing the brachial gland exudate onto their head and neck. Slow lorises frequently lick their own brachial gland regions and also wipe their brachial gland against their head. The brachial gland is active in lorises as young as 6 weeks old (Hagey et al., 2006). Illustration shows the brachial gland (dark patch) on the ventral side of a slow loris. Drawing by Helga Schulze (Krane et al., 2003).

Brachial gland exudate and Fel d 1
The brachial gland produces exudate with an allergen that is similar to the Fel d 1 cat allergen (Hagey et al., 2006; Krane et al., 2003). This brachial gland exudate shares a high degree of similarity in sequence, as well as unusual disulfide-bridged heterodimeric structure similar with Fel d 1. Fel d 1 is an allergen found mostly in saliva and the sebaceous glands (glands found inside the skin) of domestic cats, Felis catus. Humans with a cat allergy are allergic to five known allergen produced by domestic cats, Fel d 1 being one of them. However, the biological function of Fel d 1 is still currently unknown (Grönlund et al., 2010).


So are slow lorises venomous or poisonous?
To answer this, let's revisit the definitions of venomous and poisonous. A venomous animal injects toxins into its victim's body by bite or sting. A poisonous animal, on the other hand, produces toxins that are poisonous once inhaled or ingested. Medical literature shows that human - slow loris injuries come from slow loris bites and not from ingesting their toxins. So are slow lorises venomous? Well, not quite.

Slow lorises have needle-like teeth called dental combs or tooth combs on their lower jaw. Paired with the constant licking of the brachial gland, it is not surprising that one would assume the dental comb plays a part in injecting brachial gland exudate into unsuspecting victims (Hagey et al., 2006). However, this is not the case.

Used for grooming, dental combs might look menacing to some but their function is less sinister than one might conjure up. A bite from a slow loris is painful due to their sharp pointed teeth. Illustration of slow loris teeth from Loris Conservation. The dental comb is on the lower jaw, shape like a spade.

Wilde (1972) reports that the victim of a slow loris bite immediately succumbs to anaphylactic shock (extreme allergic reaction) followed by hematuria. In spite of that, the victim fully recovered. There is no clinical evidence of toxic substances in slow loris saliva to support the notion that they are venomous (Wilde, 1972).

Another incident involves a 34 year-old woman who is 19 weeks pregnant. She was bitten by a pygmy slow loris at the zoo she works in. The patient only complained about an acute pain at the location where she was bitten. She did not go into anaphylactic shock (Kalimullah et al., 2008).

Slow loris bite. Photo by Helena Fitch-Snyder from Loris Conservation.

Reports of slow loris bites are rare in literature. However, based on these published reports, it seems that slow loris bites are not venomous (Kalimullah et al., 2008; Wilde, 1972). Due to the high degree of similarity between the brachial gland exudate of slow lorises and the Fel d 1 allergen in domestic cats, the anaphylactic shock expressed by victims is probably just a reaction to the exudate's allergen.

What is the function of the brachial gland exudate?
Hagey et al. (2007) posit that the brachial gland exudate is used as olfactory signalling to broadcast individual home range and territories. Most nocturnal primates rely on olfaction -- slow loris included. Since brachial gland exudates are not an immediate response to stress or pursuit, their function might be to deter predators, warn other slow lorises of danger or even both (Hagey et al., 2006).

I'm looking forward to more studies on these prosimians and the properties of their brachial gland exudates. More research, as well as slow loris bite records, are needed to elucidate the effects of brachial gland exudates on humans.



References:
Gron, KJ. 2009. Primate Factsheets: Slow Loris (Nycticebus) Taxonomy, Morphology & Ecology. Primate Info Net Retrieved October, 19 2010 http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/slow_loris.


Grönlund, H. Saarne, T. Gafvelin, G. van Hage, M. 2010. The Major Cat Allergen, Fel d 1, in Diagnosis and Therapy. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 151(4): 265-274.

Hagey, LR. Fry, BG. Fitch-Snyder, H. 2007. Talking Defensively: A Dual Use for the Brachial Gland Exudate of Slow and Pygmy Lorises. Primate Anti-Predatory Strategies 2: 253-272 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-34810-0_12.

Krane, S. Itagaki, Y. Nakanishi, K. Weldon, PJ. 2003. "Venom" of the slow loris: sequence similarity of prosimian skin gland protein and Fel d 1 cat allergen. Naturwissenschaften 90: 60-62.

Kalimullah, EA. Schmidt, SM. Schmidt, MJ. Lu, JJ. 2008. Beware the Pygmy Slow Loris? Clinical Toxicology 46(7): 602. http://www.eapcct.org/publicfile.php?folder=congress&file=Abstracts_Toronto.pdf.

Wilde, H. 1972. Anaphylactic Shock Following Bite by a 'Slow Loris', Nycticebus coucang. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 21(5): 592-594. http://www.ajtmh.org/cgi/content/abstract/21/5/592.

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Interspecies grooming at The Bronx Zoo

Interspecies grooming between Bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata) and Gray langur (Semnopithecus entellus thersites) at Kalakkad and Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Photo from TrekNature by Gopi.

Interspecies grooming is not unheard of and does occur naturally. While grooming can be dyadic and triadic (or even more), it can also be one-directional. Since grooming is central to primate sociality, there are reported instances of grooming between two different species of primates or even between a primate and non-primate. Grooming has many functions: hygiene, social bonding and even gaining favor.


I found this video yesterday (above) on Youtube by thekingchivas. I could not believe my eyes with what the camera caught. It shows a Malayan tapir (Tapirus indicus) being groomed by a White-cheeked gibbon (Nomascus leucogenys). After doing a Google search, I realize that this is not an isolated incident. Apparently The Bronx Zoo is also aware of this behavior and had posted its own video, which seems to be a separate incident from the one caught by thekingchivas.


I'm not going to definitively say that the tapir will not reciprocate in this grooming but chances are highly unlikely. I wonder what makes these gibbons (there were two females in the exhibit, The Bronx Zoo currently has a mated pair) groom their fellow exhibit-mate. While this might not be an altruistic exchange, we can view it as a mutual symbiotic relationship. Neither animal had its fitness reduced, so it is not altruism. Instead, both individuals benefit from this interaction so it is symbiotic.

The gibbons meticulously groom the tapir to remove insects, which in turns become a tasty snack for these gibbons. The tapir on the other hand, benefits by having pesky insects removed off its body. Is it significant that both animals are female? Is this behavior natural? There are recorded accounts of interspecies grooming between primates and non-primates, so it is quite likely.

A macaque grooming a goat on the streets of Chilkur, India. An example of mutual symbiosis between a primate and a non-primate. Photo by Libran Lover from A Lover's Journal.

A langur grooming a pig in Jaipur, India. Somehow nature managed to put two animals that I have polar opposite feelings together (one I love, the other I hate). Another example of mutual symbiosis between a primate and a non-primate. Photo by Christa Kate Hyland from Laddus and Langis.

The range of both Malayan tapirs and White-cheeked gibbons does not overlap. Malayan tapirs occur in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Myanmar while White-cheeked gibbons are found in Vietnam, Laos and the Yunnan province of China. Therefore, interspecies grooming between Malayan tapir and White-cheeked gibbon is probably a novel behavior that cannot be observed in the wild.

Map shows the current and historic range of Malayan tapir, as of 2003. Notice that Malayan tapirs do not occur in Vietnam, Laos nor China (Yunnan province) where White-cheek gibbons occur. Illustration by Sasha Kopf from Wikipedia.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Macaques and Their "Pet" Kittens

Do you remember a post last month on pet keeping in animals? If you don't remember or never read it, here's the link (Do animals keep pets?). I just received a link from a friend of mine (Thanks Kristen!) about a long tailed macaque adopting a kitten in Ubud, a town in Bali, Indonesia. Below is a YouTube video of said macaque with his "pet" kitten taken in 2008. Read more about this story on Treehugger and on Telegraph.



There is also another "documented" incident of a macaque adopting a kitten in the city of Jhansi, India. This video was taken in 2007.


Do you think that these two incidents provide enough evidence that animals (primates) are capable of pet-keeping? Or is this merely nurturing instinct that is hardwired into some animals? Again, what is your take on pet-keeping and how would you define it? Are pet-keeping unique to humans? 

In a glance, I personally think that these two incidents merely shows a more nurturing side of the macaques than pet-keeping. Although, since this is not a longitudinal study, I can't extrapolate much from a few minutes of footage. What do you think? 

And to end this post, here's a gratuitous picture of a nurturing primate and his pet kitten.



Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Female Rhesus macaques: Grooming, group size, and feeding priority

Michelle from Spider Monkey Tales has an interesting post about her poster: Grooming, group size, and feeding priority in female Rhesus macaques in Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico. You can check her poster if you happen to be going to the 79th annual AAPA meeting in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Allogrooming in Verreaux's Sifaka


Finally a paper about grooming patterns! On "early view" in American Journal of Primatology, is Rebecca J. Lewis's Grooming Patterns in Verreaux's Sifaka (free abstract). If you would like to read the article, let me know and I can send you the whole article in pdf.

I can definitely relate to the first sentence of this paper's abstract, "Lemur grooming has received very little attention in the literature". It has became apparent to me when I was visiting different graduate schools that professors would comment "Well, there aren't much grooming going on in the species that I study so you'll just be wasting time". While it is important to collect data on species that groom a lot, it is also important to document grooming patterns in species that don't groom a lot so that we can compare these data. Why don't these species groom as much? What alternative strategies are they using instead of grooming?

Well back to the article. As you might have guessed, it's about grooming patterns in Verreaux's Sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi). What's unique about prosimians grooming is that they don't groom with their fingers, instead they groom with their dental comb. In her paper, Lewis found is that these sifakas:
  • Spend very little time allogrooming. 
  • Allogrooming happens on parts of the body that can be easily autogroomed (self groomed). 
  • While ectoparasite loads are greater in the rainy season, the rate of allogrooming did not increase.
  • Allogrooming rates are influenced by sex and rank. Sifakas groom up the rank with females receiving more grooming than males. Males also tend to groom others more than females do.
  • Allogrooming rates increased by 50-100% during mating season. Males tend to initiate grooming during mating season but generally are not reciprocated by females.

These results suggest that Verreaux's Sifaka used grooming as a social function, not as a health function. Lewis also posits that lemur grooming patterns do not differ from anthropoid grooming patterns as much as previously thought.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Geladas and Hamadryas: A Comparative Study Of Grooming

I'm currently working on a Senior Honors Thesis before I graduate this Spring. It's a comparative study of grooming between gelada baboons (Theropithecus gelada) and hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas hamadryas). This study is being done in The Prospect Park Zoo and The Bronx Zoo (Both are Wildlife Conservation Society Parks). Prospect Park Zoo houses a troop of hamadryas baboons indoors while gelada baboons can be found in an outdoor exhibit at The Bronx Zoo.

I will write about how my research is progressing on this blog, along with news and articles related to primates and hominins.

Below are some pictures of my focal animals.