Caught in the act. Mother and infant Sumatran Orangutan sharing their kill, a slow loris. Photo from NewScientist. |
Sumatran Orangutans (Pongo abelii) are not the first great ape to have a taste for meat. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) from Gombe Stream National Park were observed hunting and eating red colobus monkeys (Colobus badius tephrosceles) by Dr. Jane Goodall while savannah chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in Fongoli have been observed hunting and eating lesser bushbabies (Galago senegalensis) by Dr. Jill Pruetz.
The authors also touched on very fundamental yet intriguing questions about meat-eating and hominid evolution in this paper. What are the minimum time on chewing is necessary for an adult female Australopithecus africanus to reach its daily energy requirement when subsisting partially on raw meat? How did meat became a substantial component of hominid diet?
A. africanus needs 1202–1507 calories per day for their daily energy requirement. By using the chewing rate of P. abelii as a model, the authors estimate that A. africanus have to chew about 2 hours on raw meat to achieve 25% of their caloric needs while the remaining 75% were subsisted from easier to chew food sources such as leaves and insects. Raw meat does not seem to be an efficient way to satisfy caloric needs but seemed to be a "fallback" resource when other food source are scarce. As to when meat became a substantial component of hominid diet, it is probably after the "discovery" of fire by Homo erectus. Cooked meat are easier to chew and provides more nutrient than from raw meat. The rate of mastication also decreases because most fibers within raw meat are broken down after it's cooked.
6 comments:
To be fair, giant pandas are also known to eat meat on occasion.
I know, I was trying to be funny :(
I suppose you could always pick on koalas. XD
Yes, Koalas. EAT SOMETHING ELSE!!!
I am afraid to see a paper next month saying that Koalas have discovered meat-eating and is now eating carrion on the Australian highways. LOL!
The paper is really interesting. But my question is: was it necessary to move from apes ecology to fossils bioenergetics? Meat-eating by orangs is interesting to understand orangutans biology and evolution. The paper begins directly with the Australopithecus issue, since its first lines! It sounds like, to be interesting or relevant, it must be somehow related to human evolution. Otherwise it is nothing more than ... boring primate biology!?
Emi, I think the paper is trying to use Australopithecus as a model for raw meat eating and why this food resource fallback works (or doesn't). As with most, if not all, in Primatology, everything eventually comes back to human. :)
Post a Comment